Each of Kershaw’s Game Line’s Against the Giants (2008-2015)
Clayton Kershaw is good. Studies have been done, scouts have been asked, fantasy players have benefitted from his performances, this is pretty much confirmed by now. Since you’re curious about how the possibly compromised Madison Bumgarner will do against the ace of the Dodgers. The embedding is admittedly a little messy since I haven’t been doing this for a while and I’m lucky I’m able to do this post while my kid is awake. Here are the lines from Kershaw’s appearances (2008 was a relief appearance) against the Giants. Not a lot to look forward to if you’re a fan of the Giants offense.
2008
Date | Opp ▴ | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 28 | @ | SFG | L,1-3 | 6-6 | H(1) | 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.26 | 5 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
107.2 | 109 | 51 | 52 | 100 | 11 | 1 | 4.26 | 470 |
2009 — I’m pretty sure I was at this game. It was not a fun game for the Giants offense.
Date | Opp ▴ | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 15 | SFG | W,5-4 | GS-7 | 5 | 7.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1.50 | 22 | 105 | 63 | 14 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 83 | ||
171.0 | 119 | 53 | 91 | 185 | 7 | 1 | 2.79 | 701 |
2010 — good every time, but Giants won the title
Date | Opp ▴ | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 14 | @ | SFG | W,1-0 | SHO | W(12-10) | 6 | 9.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2.85 | 30 | 111 | 72 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 83 |
Aug 1 | @ | SFG | L,0-2 | GS-7 | L(10-6) | 6 | 7.0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2.94 | 32 | 117 | 69 | 21 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 59 |
Jul 20 | SFG | L,5-7 | GS-7 | 4 | 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 3.15 | 26 | 104 | 64 | 19 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 56 | ||
Apr 18 | SFG | W,2-1 | GS-8 | 4 | 7.0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3.18 | 28 | 114 | 74 | 20 | 17 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 70 | ||
204.1 | 160 | 66 | 81 | 212 | 13 | 7 | 2.91 | 848 |
2011 — one non-Kershaw start, but the others the Giants other three games had a combined 2 runs of offense
Date | Opp ▴ | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 20 | SFG | W,2-1 | GS-8 | W(20-5) | 5 | 7.1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2.27 | 28 | 115 | 75 | 19 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 66 | |
Sep 9 | @ | SFG | W,2-1 | GS-8 | W(18-5) | 4 | 8.0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2.36 | 28 | 111 | 76 | 19 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 82 |
Jul 20 | @ | SFG | W,1-0 | GS-8 | W(11-4) | 4 | 8.0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2.72 | 29 | 112 | 70 | 19 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 87 |
May 18 | SFG | L,5-8 | GS-5 | 4 | 5.0 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3.09 | 23 | 85 | 54 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 42 | ||
Apr 11 | @ | SFG | W,6-1 | GS-7 | W(2-1) | 5 | 6.2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.37 | 27 | 117 | 72 | 18 | 12 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 67 |
Mar 31 | SFG | W,2-1 | GS-7 | W(1-0) | 99 | 7.0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 26 | 96 | 65 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 77 | |
233.1 | 174 | 59 | 54 | 248 | 15 | 3 | 2.28 | 912 |
2012 — Kershaw was the Giants’ daddy
Date | Opp ▴ | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 3 | SFG | W,5-1 | GS-8 | W(14-9) | 4 | 8.0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2.53 | 29 | 111 | 71 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 77 | |
Aug 20 | SFG | L,1-2 | GS-8 | L(11-7) | 4 | 8.0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2.87 | 29 | 109 | 81 | 25 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 72 | |
Jul 29 | @ | SFG | W,4-0 | SHO | W(8-6) | 4 | 9.0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2.95 | 32 | 116 | 74 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 83 |
Jun 26 | @ | SFG | L,0-2 | GS-6 | L(5-4) | 4 | 6.0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2.74 | 28 | 104 | 65 | 18 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 54 |
May 8 | SFG | L,1-2 | GS-8 | L(2-1) | 5 | 8.0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2.56 | 29 | 94 | 66 | 17 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 70 | |
227.2 | 170 | 64 | 63 | 229 | 16 | 5 | 2.53 | 901 |
2013 — average earned runs per start: 1.5. The Giants still managed to win two games.
Date | Opp ▴ | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 13 | SFG | L,2-4 | GS-7 | L(14-9) | 4 | 7.0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.94 | 28 | 106 | 80 | 24 | 7 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 57 | |
Jul 7 | @ | SFG | W,4-1 | GS-8 | W(8-5) | 4 | 8.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1.89 | 28 | 100 | 68 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 74 |
Jun 26 | SFG | W,4-2 | GS-9 | W(6-5) | 4 | 8.0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2.08 | 29 | 104 | 71 | 23 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 72 | |
May 3 | @ | SFG | L,1-2 | GS-7 | 4 | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.66 | 26 | 104 | 62 | 13 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 69 | |
Apr 1 | SFG | W,4-0 | SHO | W(1-0) | 99 | 9.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 30 | 94 | 65 | 23 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 86 | |
236.0 | 164 | 48 | 52 | 232 | 11 | 3 | 1.83 | 908 |
2014 — Kershaw allows three earned runs in May, gets beat. Otherwise, classic Kershaw.
Date | Opp ▴ | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 24 | SFG | W,9-1 | GS-8 | W(21-3) | 4 | 8.0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1.77 | 31 | 117 | 83 | 20 | 16 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 75 | |
Sep 14 | @ | SFG | W,4-2 | GS-8 | W(19-3) | 5 | 8.0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1.70 | 31 | 110 | 78 | 12 | 18 | 10 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 68 |
Jul 26 | @ | SFG | W,5-0 | SHO | W(12-2) | 5 | 9.0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.76 | 30 | 113 | 78 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 87 |
May 11 | SFG | L,4-7 | GS-7 | 4 | 7.0 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1.74 | 26 | 92 | 66 | 16 | 14 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 60 | ||
198.1 | 139 | 39 | 31 | 239 | 9 | 2 | 1.77 | 749 |
2015 — Another non-Kershaw-type start in May, Giants post a winning record against Kershaw
Date | Opp ▴ | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 29 | @ | SFG | W,8-0 | SHO | W(16-7) | 4 | 9.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2.16 | 29 | 104 | 73 | 16 | 17 | 4 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 97 |
Sep 2 | SFG | W,2-1 | CG | W(12-6) | 4 | 9.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2.18 | 32 | 132 | 95 | 20 | 32 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 85 | |
May 21 | @ | SFG | L,0-4 | GS-8 | L(2-3) | 5 | 7.1 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4.32 | 31 | 99 | 67 | 17 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 53 |
Apr 28 | SFG | L,1-2 | GS-7 | L(1-2) | 5 | 7.0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3.73 | 27 | 92 | 66 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 63 | |
Apr 22 | @ | SFG | L,2-3 | GS-6 | 4 | 6.0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4.07 | 21 | 93 | 64 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 66 | |
232.2 | 163 | 55 | 42 | 301 | 15 | 5 | 2.13 | 890 |
2016 — clearly the pattern is the Giants will go undefeated against Kershaw, scoring 1 or 2 runs in every other start except for May, where he will allow 4 runs.
Can’t wait.